Breakout Summary Report

 

ARM/ASR User and PI Meeting

10 - 13 June 2019

Open Science for Advancing Knowledge Transfer Across CESD
13 June 2019
10:30 AM - 12:30 PM
40
Scott Collis, Giri Prakash, Mariko Oue, William Gustafson, Joseph Hardin

Breakout Description

ARM and ASR have a diverse pool of stakeholders, PIs, and scientists working in the service of science. Each day these scientists carry out a largely common set of tasks — for example, looking at data quality, making plots, performing retrievals, running simulations, and making inferences. Occasionally an essential idea for one group is sitting within unreleased code at another institution. A key way of facilitating knowledge transfer is through Open Science, which can be broken down into six components: open-source code, open data, open educational resources, open access, open methodology, and open peer review. This session will focus on the first three. The main goals of the session are:




  • Answering the question, "what is open science?"

  • Capturing the state of open-source projects and open science efforts across CESD
  • Give scientists working on tools the opportunity to inform attendees as to the tool's availability

  • Highlighting ARM and ASR efforts in open data

  • Identifying key areas for future development across science and infrastructure

  • Soliciting audience feedback on activities that could accelerate science in CESD through workshops, short courses (e.g., AGU/AMS), and new capabilities in ARM



This session will be half presentation based and half open discussion with the deliverable being a session report capturing the state of open science in CESD and suggestions for future directions.

Main Discussion

Scott Collis opened proceedings with a framing discussion and highlighted why he gets personal and professional satisfaction from Open Science.



Giri Prakash gave a short and very well received presentation on the FIND framework for good open data.
Bill Gustafson gave a presentation on thoughts and challenges in getting parts of LASSO into the public domain.



Mariko Oue gave a presentation on the open-source CR-SIM radar simulator highlighting several use cases. Mariko highlighted plans to frequently communicate with users to improve CR-SIM and better organize the packages.



Joseph Hardin presented how an open-source library (PyDSD) was transitioned to an ARM VAP (PARSQUANTS).



Peter Marinescu presented on the open-source tracking software TOBAC, which is supporting ACPC (and other) efforts.


Key Findings

Licencing remains a key and fraught area of publishing open-source software from within the laboratory system. The act of making submissions to existing community packages can be a gray area in terms of intellectual property and who owns it (The lab, DOE, or the individual).

An issue was raised that, when multiple frameworks exist (for instance in cell/object tracking) choosing which one to use can be very difficult.

There was some discussion on if a “clearing house” that catalogs all CESD-funded software would help users and program managers. It would be good if this could be a system that promotes the software beyond the CESD community. It was raised that OSTI might fill this need.

Needs

More clarity and uniform policies on software across DOE.

Future Plans

Scott and Giri to look more at OSTI and if it already fulfills the needs of a clearing house.