Subcloud convergence lines: properties and implications on deep-convection initiation

 

Submitter

Kirshbaum, Daniel — McGill University

Area of research

Vertical Velocity

Journal Reference

Liu S, K Sindhu, and D Kirshbaum. 2023. "Observations of boundary-layer convergence lines and associated updrafts in the US Southern Great Plains." Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 80(12), 10.1175/JAS-D-23-0089.1.

Science

Boundary-layer convergence lines (CLs) and their associated subcloud updrafts are responsible for many, if not most, deep-convection initiation events in the continental USA. To quantify the morphology and strength of CLs, and to compare them to ordinary turbulent circulations in the boundary layer, we develop two methods of CL quantification using available data at the SGP observatory. Using six years of data including dozens of CLs, it is found that CLs are only marginally stronger and wider than ordinary turbulent thermals.

Impact

A highlight of this work is the development of two methods to quantify CL properties, one primarily based on radar and the other primarily based on surface meteorological observations. The latter method facilitates CL analysis in locations lacking the unique observational assets at ARM climate research facilities. Moreover, the scientific findings obtained herein direct research on deep-convection initiation to identifying important factors beyond subcloud updraft width and strength.

Summary

Deep convection is commonly initiated by boundary-layer convergence lines (CLs), which are associated with intense surface-based wind convergence and strong updrafts that may lift air to saturation. Although CLs form regularly, they are far less common than ordinary, short-lived turbulent thermals in the daytime boundary layer. To better understand why CLs are so effective at deep-convection initiation, we observationally quantify their morphologies and strengths and compare these properties to those of surrounding turbulent updrafts. Perhaps surprisingly, the CLs are found to exhibit only slightly larger scales and strengths than the turbulent updrafts. Although these marginal increases help to explain the preference for storms to initiate along CLs, they likely are not the whole story.